虽然今天俄罗斯和乌克兰之间终于爆发了局部冲突，但本篇不打算关注热点。今天，来看一篇和科技公司相关的文章。
在iPhone上通过 App Store 购买的付费商品除了给开发者的费用，还需要交一部分钱给苹果——俗称“苹果税”。 这一部分，竞争对手们一直虎视眈眈，如今监管者也开始关注这一生态。
笔者的态度：站苹果，但可以适当的降低“苹果税”的税率。iOS 生态强于 Android 的原因不光是系统的封闭性，也在于 App Store 的强管理。
句子精选
Apple Finds Itself Under Scrutiny in Washington’s Big Tech Clampdown
Scrutiny /’skrutəni/审查
Clampdown 压制;
苹果发现处于华府对大型科技公司压制的审查中
U.S. lawmakers in both parties are [expressing concern with] how Apple Inc. runs its App Store, [leaving] the company [playing defense against] legislation that would loosen (its grip on the profitable business).
美国两党的立法者对苹果公司如何运营 App Store 感到担忧，使得苹果公司针对意图削弱其盈利业务的立法展开辩护。
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 20-2 this month to [advance legislation] that could [erode the fees] Apple collects on digital app revenues.
erode /ɪˈroʊd/ 削弱，损害；侵蚀；
参议院司法委员会本月以20票赞成、2票反对的表决结果推进了一项立法，该立法可能会削弱苹果在数字应用收入上收取的费用。
The bill [is backed by] (a loose alliance of Apple’s rivals), including Epic Games Inc. and Microsoft Corp.
be backed by
该法案得到了一个由苹果竞争对手组成的松散联盟的支持，包括Epic Games Inc.和Microsoft Corp。
It also offers (a middle ground) for lawmakers who want to [rein in Big Tech] but can’t [reach consensus on] (thorny issues) such as how to [regulate social media content].
rein[reɪn] n 缰绳；v 控制；
它还为那些希望控制大型科技企业，但在如何监管社交媒体内容等棘手问题上无法达成共识的议员提供了一个中间立场。
(That Senate leaders have Apple in their sights) is a marked change from Congress’s focus on other tech issues such as Amazon.com Inc.’s treatment of retailers, control of the ad business by Alphabet Inc.’s Google and how Meta Platforms Inc. manages content that could be harmful on Facebook and Instagram.
参议院领导人对苹果的关注，与国会对其他科技公司问题，如亚马逊对待零售商的政策，Alphabet的Google对广告业务的控制以及Meta如何管理Facebook和Instagram上可能有害的内容，相比，有了一个显著的变化。
For a long time, Apple [floated above the fray] in Washington, and now the company has “been [pulled down into the muck].”
在很长一段时间里，苹果公司在华盛顿的纷争中置身事外，现在该公司已经“被拖入泥潭”。
While Apple’s lobbying expenditure of about $6.5 million last year was roughly a third that of Amazon or Meta, Mr. Cook has long used (his public persona) to personally influence those in power and guide the company through Washington entanglements.
虽然苹果去年的游说支出约为650万美元，约为亚马逊或Meta的三分之一，但库克长期以来一直利用自己的公众形象，亲自影响当权者，引导公司走出华盛顿的纠葛。
The distribution of third-party software to iPhones was (at the heart of) a high-profile antitrust lawsuit brought by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games. While Apple mostly won last year, its practices attracted renewed attention, and the verdict [drew cries from rivals] that Congress needs to [address the tech giant’s power].
向iPhone分发第三方软件是“堡垒之夜”的制造商Epic Games提起的一场备受瞩目的反垄断诉讼的核心。虽然苹果去年基本上赢了，但它的做法再次引起了人们的关注，判决也引起了竞争对手的呼声，即国会需要解决这家科技巨头的权力问题。
原文
Apple Finds Itself Under Scrutiny in Washington’s Big Tech Clampdown
CEO Tim Cook called senators in vain effort to derail bill targeting Apple’s App Store
U.S. lawmakers in both parties are expressing concern with how Apple Inc. runs its App Store, leaving the company playing defense against legislation that would loosen its grip on the profitable business.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 20-2 this month to advance legislation that could erode the fees Apple collects on digital app revenues. The vote came despite calls to senators by Chief Executive Tim Cook, and the company’s warnings that the bill would hurt user privacy and security.
The bill is backed by a loose alliance of Apple’s rivals, including Epic Games Inc. and Microsoft Corp. It also offers a middle ground for lawmakers who want to rein in Big Tech but can’t reach consensus on thorny issues such as how to regulate social media content.
That Senate leaders have Apple in their sights is a marked change from Congress’s focus on other tech issues such as Amazon.com Inc.’s treatment of retailers, control of the ad business by Alphabet Inc.’s Google and how Meta
Platforms Inc. manages content that could be harmful on Facebook and Instagram.
Mr. Cook also didn’t face the same intensity of questions as the other CEOs–Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, and Google’s Sundar Pichai who testified at a 2020 congressional hearing into Big Tech’s market power.
“For a long time, Apple floated above the fray in Washington,” said Paul Gallant, a policy analyst with Cowen & Co. Now, he said, the company has “been pulled down into the muck.”
While Apple’s lobbying expenditure of about $6.5 million last year was roughly a third that of Amazon or Meta, Mr. Cook has long used his public persona to personally influence those in power and guide the company through Washington entanglements.
During the Trump administration he cultivated a relationship with the former
president’s family that played a role in exempting iPhones and some other electronic products from tariffs.
The app store bill is now just one front in a war Apple is fighting against rivals around the world as they challenge its control of the app economy and access to the more than one billion users of its devices.
The distribution of third-party software to iPhones was at the heart of a high-profile antitrust lawsuit brought by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games. While Apple mostly won last year, its practices attracted renewed attention, and the verdict drew cries from rivals that Congress needs to address the tech giant’s power.
Apple has argued that it provides a digital ecosystem that users want and that the fees it collects– up to 30% of transactions -are fair for the technology
it is providing.
Mr. Cook shared a stage with Sen. Mike Lee (R. Utah) at a tech conference in
Salt Lake City last October and made the case that Apple shouldn’t be lumped in with social-media companies.
“The industry isn’t monolithic,” Mr. Cook said. “They’re very different segments and very different markets…we’re not in the social-media business.”
Mr. Lee praised Apple’s entrepreneurship at the time, but he voted to advance the bill targeting app stores -citing complaints from Tile Inc., the tracking-device maker that has accused Apple of discriminatory conduct, and Parler, the social-media app that Apple and Google removed from app stores after the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot.
Tech giants “are wielding an extraordinarily large amount of market power,” said Mr. Lee during the vote. He declined to comment for this article.
The bill targeting app platforms still has a long road ahead. It would allow developers to sidestep Apple altogether by allowing “sideloading” of software onto iPhones outside of its App Store, or to let apps use the store but skip Apple’s in-app payment system.
The bill would also apply to the app store on Google’s Android operating system, called Google Play.
A second, broader bill previously passed the committee, though the debate was more contentious and the vote tally was closer, at 16-6. It would target allegedly discriminatory conduct on other large tech platforms as well as app stores. Mr. Lee opposed it.
In recent weeks, Apple has said sideloading would allow social-media companies, such as Facebook, to sidestep safeguards put in place to limit how user data is collected.
“Apple made a choice to prohibit sideloading and alternative app distribution because smartphones contain a person’s most sensitive data and protecting that data is imperative,” Timothy Powderly, an Apple lobbyist, told Senate leaders in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
Lawmakers aren’t dismissing all of Apple’s entreaties, and in some cases have changed their legislative proposals to address the company’s concerns. But the Senate votes, particularly the support from Republicans, will improve the bills’ ‘ chances of passing the House, said Rep. Ken Buck (R. Colo.), the primary Republican backing the legislation in the lower chamber.
Ahead of the Senate votes, Mr. Cook made the company’ “‘s case on a 40- minute call with Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, where Apple has a large campus.
Mr. Cruz, who described the call during one of the committee votes, said Mr. Cook raised a concern that the bill “would erect obstacles to Apple giving consumers the ability to opt out of apps monitoring what they are doing online.”
Mr. Cruz said he disagreed, pointing to provisions that make allowances for moves to protect privacy. “The language of this bill is entirely consistent with consumers being given the right to opt out, ” he said.
He voted for both bills, saying tech companies’ market power “would make John D. Rockefeller blush.” He also said he would seek alterations to the bills before a vote by the full Senate.
In at least one case, Apple’s outreach left a senator feeling rebuffed. The company requested a phone call between Mr. Cook and Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R., Tenn.) but canceled it before the app store vote, a person familiar with the matter said.
During the committee debate, Ms. Blackburn remarked on the “arrogance of some of the executives in the Silicon Valley who believe that they don’t need to work with us here in Congress.”
The pre-vote call was postponed because of scheduling conflicts and no other reason, according to an Apple spokesman. Mr. Cook and Ms. Blackburn eventually spoke about two weeks later, and she pushed back against the CEO’s arguments about the bill affecting users’ privacy and security, the person familiar with the matter said.
Before the recent Senate votes, Mr. Cook also reached out to Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.), according to her office. She has accused Apple of blocking competition.
All the Democrats on the Senate panel voted to advance the app store bill, although California’s two senators expressed reservations.
“Some consumers might prefer a closed device that provides a layer of security said Sen. Alex Padilla (D., Calif.) of the app store bill. “If we aren’t careful, we might be taking a choice away from the marketplace.”
Comments